▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(名模吉吉哈蒂案深度解析二)

蘇思鴻 律師
發表時間:2020/10/16 17:13 283 次瀏覽

New York-based O’Neil asserts that Hadid infringed his exclusive rights as the copyright holder of the photo “by reproducing and publicly displaying [it] on her Instagram story,” despite the fact that she “is not, and has never been, licensed or otherwise authorized to reproduce, publicly display, distribute and/or use the photograph.” In doing so, O’Neil claims that the 24-year old supermodel ran afoul of his exclusive right to display the image, and distribute copies of it to the public by sale or another form of transfer, such as licensing, among other things. As a result, she should be forced to pay “statutory damages up to $150,000 per work infringed for [her] willful infringement of the photograph,” he argues.
位在紐約的O’Neil 主張哈蒂的行為侵害其為攝影著作之著作人專有重製及公開展示之著作財產權。事實是她未取得授權去重製、公開展示、散布或利用該照片。 O’Neil起訴主張這位24歲的超模,不管是藉由銷售或是另外諸如授權的方式去移轉,侵害其公開展示及散布之排他權。因此,她須就其惡意侵害之每一張照片給付最高至15萬元之法定賠償金。

蘇思鴻 律師 superhung

  • 聯絡電話: 0920235793
  • 執業年資: 5年以上
  • 蘇思鴻律師
  • 竹東武功堂(蘇氏古厝)