▲人工智能尚無法取代人類感知體悟情感表達之創作

蘇思鴻 律師
發表時間:2023/04/27 14:02 293 次瀏覽

AI-generated art can be copyrighted, say US officials – with a catch
美國現今的見解,人工智能創作的作品是可享有著作權的;但…


The US Copyright Office will consider an AI-generated work copyrightable if a human can prove they themselves put a meaningful amount of creative effort into the final content, according to a policy published on Thursday.假設創作人可證明在創作中投注相當程度之創意於其創作中的話,美國著作權辦公室將審酌人工智能創作的作品是可有著作權的,

AI software capable of automatically generating images or text from an input prompt or instruction has made it easier for people to churn out content. Correspondingly, the USCO has received an increasing number of applications to register copyright protections for material, especially artwork, created using such tools.

US law states that intellectual property can be copyrighted only if it was the product of human creativity, and the USCO only acknowledges work authored by humans at present. Machines and generative AI algorithms, therefore, cannot be authors, and their outputs are not copyrightable. 

Digital art, poems, and books generated using tools like DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, ChatGPT, or even the newly released GPT-4 will not be protected by copyright if they were created by humans using only a text description or prompt, USCO director Shira Perlmutter warned. 

蘇思鴻 律師

  • 聯絡電話: 0920235793
  • 執業年資: 5年以上
  • 蘇律師事務所
  • 竹東武功堂