Plaintiffs seek various forms of relief, including a declaration that Suno and Udio willfully infringed on the Plaintiffs’ protected sound recordings, injunctive relief restraining further infringement of the recordings, statutory damages for willful infringement under 17 USC § 504(c) for up to $150,000 per infringed work (662 songs for Suno and 1,670 songs for Udio), as well as costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief that the court deems just and proper
原告提起不同途徑之救濟，包括Suno與Udio故意侵害原告等受保護之錄音物；假處分以避免被告等進一步侵害著作權；依17 USC § 504(c)請求就侵害每一著作最高至 $150,000之損害賠償，併同裁判費及律師費與其他法院認為合理正當的請求。
Some key cases against generative AI companies, such as Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd. and Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., set forth the standards used by courts when reviewing allegations of copyright infringement involving AI. Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., widely referred to as the “Sarah Silverman Case” due to the involvement of the renowned comedian and author Sarah Silverman, centers on allegations of copyright infringement against Meta.In the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the plaintiffs accused Meta of unauthorized use of their copyrighted works to train Meta's LLaMA (Large Language Model Meta AI) language model. Following Meta’s motion to dismiss, the court stated that the plaintiffs did not provide specific examples or allegations showing substantial similarity between the outputs of the model and their copyrighted works.
當審查涉及人工智能侵害著作權主張時，法院會利用諸如Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.與Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc.,等訟案中建立之標準。以Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc.,案為例，此案泛稱為“Sarah Silverman 案”，涉及知名喜劇演員兼作家Sarah Silverman ，該案以對Meta侵害著作權為主張之核心。原告在美國加州北區法院起訴，主張Meta未經授權利用原告著作訓練其大型語言模型Meta AI。訴訟中Meta答辯請求法院駁回原告之訴，繼之法院駁回原告之訴，理由為原告未提出具體證據或主張以證明模型輸出成品與原告等著作間具實質近似。
Plaintiffs seek various forms of relief, including a declaration that Suno and Udio willfully infringed on the Plaintiffs’ protected sound recordings, injunctive relief restraining further infringement of the recordings, statutory damages for willful infringement under 17 USC § 504(c) for up to $150,000 per infringed work (662 songs for Suno and 1,670 songs for Udio), as well as costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief that the court deems just and proper
原告提起不同途徑之救濟，包括Suno與Udio故意侵害原告等受保護之錄音物；假處分以避免被告等進一步侵害著作權；依17 USC § 504(c)請求就侵害每一著作最高至 $150,000之損害賠償，併同裁判費及律師費與其他法院認為合理正當的請求。