企業法務相關案例分享
▲凡妮莎·布萊恩狀告洛杉磯郡

The co-plaintiff in Vanessa Bryant’s lawsuit against Los Angeles County over the horrific photos taken from the helicopter crash that killed Kobe Brya...

▲蘇狀師談人工智能與專利

Thaler v Comptroller [2023] UKSC 49: the UKSC rules that AI cannot be an 'inventor' 英國最高法院判決人工智能不得為發明人。 To the surprise of no one, the UK ...

▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(肖像權)

隨便po張含有人像的照片,就構成侵害肖像權?千萬不要成為白白付錢的冤大頭。 先撇開著作權不談,如果在網路上看見某張人像照片,剛好可以與自己需求相符,就把它下載或是翻拍來用在自己的廣告或網頁上,這樣有無侵害照片裏那個人的肖像權,進而主張其人格權被侵害,要求財產上及非財產上的損害? 假設照片裏的...

▲被告侵害知名度之最佳答辯

Best Defenses to Right of Publicity Claims 有時某人係基於惡意起訴他人侵害其知名度;當然,其訴不見得有理由,通常是藉此威脅對造,以取得和解金。是故,對此類訴訟須了解如何答辯以保全自己。 If a company uses a person’s pho...

▲Anthropic公司被訴

Aug 20 , Artificial intelligence company Anthropic has been hit with a class-action lawsuit in California federal court by three authors who say it mi...