White v. Samsung 懷特告三星案（1992年加州的案子）名人為保護自己知名度在美國興訟，已見怪不怪，我國仍停留在肖像權、姓名權等被侵害，主張財產上及非財產上之損害，甚至以該名人有無註冊商標，另以商標權被侵害來主張損害賠償，或者是以不當得利來請求，導致對名人之保護遠不及美國，此點頗值得...
可惡的狗仔隊到處興訟，並非都需被動以和解收場，有反制之方法。 Emily Ratajkowski Has Settled A History-Making Copyright Lawsuit That Was Filed Against Her After She Posted A Paparaz...
In a recent ex tempore decision of the British Virgin Islands ("BVI") Commercial Court (the "BVI Court"), the Honourable Mr Justice Wallbank exercised...
Thaler v Comptroller [2023] UKSC 49: the UKSC rules that AI cannot be an 'inventor' 英國最高法院判決人工智能不得為發明人。 To the surprise of no one, the UK ...
The right of publicity doctrine was founded on the idea of protecting celebrities’ likenesses from being appropriated by another party without compens...
蘇思鴻律師
