Michael Jackson’s Likeness Valued at $4.1 Million in Big Tax Court Win for Estate 遺產執行人在巨額稅賦法院勝訴，該院估定麥克‧傑克森的樣貌值4百一十萬美元 On Monday, after a lengthy de...
Pele v. Samsung: Avoid lookalike identities. Pele IP Ownership LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. was brought in the Northern District of Illinois...
琳賽·蘿涵妳嘛幫幫忙，請求權基礎弄錯了，才搞到敗訴；要告就要告侵害知名度。 The actress Lindsay Lohan has failed in her latest attempt to sue the maker of the video game Grand Theft Auto ...
Lawyer deemed 'copyright troll' must file sanctions opinion in all his cases, 2nd Circuit agrees 美國第二巡迴上訴法院同意，若律師被認定為“著作權蟑螂”（著作權地痞或著作權釣魚），法官必...
White v. Samsung 懷特告三星案（1992年加州的案子）名人為保護自己知名度在美國興訟，已見怪不怪，我國仍停留在肖像權、姓名權等被侵害，主張財產上及非財產上之損害，甚至以該名人有無註冊商標，另以商標權被侵害來主張損害賠償，或者是以不當得利來請求，導致對名人之保護遠不及美國，此點頗值得...
蘇思鴻律師
