企業法務相關案例分享
▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(人死了還在賺錢,名人遺產執行人之專權)

Michael Jackson’s Likeness Valued at $4.1 Million in Big Tax Court Win for Estate 遺產執行人在巨額稅賦法院勝訴,該院估定麥克‧傑克森的樣貌值4百一十萬美元 On Monday, after a lengthy de...

▲蘇狀師談名人知名度之訴

Pele v. Samsung: Avoid lookalike identities. Pele IP Ownership LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. was brought in the Northern District of Illinois...

▲告侵害隱私權;幫幫忙告錯了,才導致敗訴

琳賽·蘿涵妳嘛幫幫忙,請求權基礎弄錯了,才搞到敗訴;要告就要告侵害知名度。 The actress Lindsay Lohan has failed in her latest attempt to sue the maker of the video game Grand Theft Auto ...

▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(著作權法篇)

Lawyer deemed 'copyright troll' must file sanctions opinion in all his cases, 2nd Circuit agrees 美國第二巡迴上訴法院同意,若律師被認定為“著作權蟑螂”(著作權地痞或著作權釣魚),法官必...

▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(名人告三星)

White v. Samsung 懷特告三星案(1992年加州的案子)名人為保護自己知名度在美國興訟,已見怪不怪,我國仍停留在肖像權、姓名權等被侵害,主張財產上及非財產上之損害,甚至以該名人有無註冊商標,另以商標權被侵害來主張損害賠償,或者是以不當得利來請求,導致對名人之保護遠不及美國,此點頗值得...