企業法務相關案例分享
▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(人死了還在賺錢,名人遺產執行人之專權)

Michael Jackson’s Likeness Valued at $4.1 Million in Big Tax Court Win for Estate 遺產執行人在巨額稅賦法院勝訴,該院估定麥克‧傑克森的樣貌值4百一十萬美元 On Monday, after a lengthy de...

▲人工智能生成公司是時候付代價了

人工智能生成模型需要大量資料、圖案及影像去訓練,故人工智能與著作權息息相關。在美國已有許多公司狀告人工智能公司,藉此捍衛其著作權,而在台灣尚未有此種案例,我們拭目以待觀其後續如何。 Authors, artists and others are filing lawsuits against ge...

▲Lindsay Lohan被訴債務不履行

Lindsay Lohan sued by HarperCollins for collecting $365K advance but never writing book Lindsay Lohan預先收了HarperCollins36萬5千美元報酬,卻未完成著作而被告。   Harp...

▲蘇狀師談人工智能與專利

Thaler v Comptroller [2023] UKSC 49: the UKSC rules that AI cannot be an 'inventor' 英國最高法院判決人工智能不得為發明人。 To the surprise of no one, the UK ...

▲藝人律師被訴判賠案

Blanks v. Shaw California Court of Appeal 171 Cal. App. 4th 336 (2009) Written by Eric Miller, JD Facts Billy Blanks (plaintiff), th...