企業法務相關案例分享
▲蘇狀師談人工智能與專利

Thaler v Comptroller [2023] UKSC 49: the UKSC rules that AI cannot be an 'inventor' 英國最高法院判決人工智能不得為發明人。 To the surprise of no one, the UK ...

▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(著作權法篇)

Twitch Is Headed For a Copyright Disaster 推奇被推往著作權之災難 Twitch may be forced to build its own ContentID–or pick a fight with the music industry.Twit...

▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(著作權法篇)

各位看官,如果某人隨便拍攝一張照片,另一人拿去做商業利用,就構成侵害攝影著作之重製權(或公開傳輸權)或散布權?不見得;尤其現今科技發達,隨便拿手機拍照片比比皆是,然後上傳至個人facebook或instagram,有些人不小心或是偷懶不自己創作或因其他原因,將之利用,不管獲利與否,該行為即構成侵害著...

▲蘇狀師談娛樂法

In Jackson v. Roberts, 972 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 2020), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently confronted a copyright question that has ...

▲凡妮莎·布萊恩狀告洛杉磯郡

The co-plaintiff in Vanessa Bryant’s lawsuit against Los Angeles County over the horrific photos taken from the helicopter crash that killed Kobe Brya...