各位看官,如果某人隨便拍攝一張照片,另一人拿去做商業利用,就構成侵害攝影著作之重製權(或公開傳輸權)或散布權?不見得;尤其現今科技發達,隨便拿手機拍照片比比皆是,然後上傳至個人facebook或instagram,有些人不小心或是偷懶不自己創作或因其他原因,將之利用,不管獲利與否,該行為即構成侵害著...
Actress Kangana Ranaut Sued For Copyright Violation Ashish Kaul, 是'Didda: The Warrior Queen of Kashmir' has accused the actress of ‘using’ ...
In Jackson v. Roberts, 972 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 2020), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently confronted a copyright question that has ...
Michael Jackson’s Likeness Valued at $4.1 Million in Big Tax Court Win for Estate 遺產執行人在巨額稅賦法院勝訴,該院估定麥克‧傑克森的樣貌值4百一十萬美元 On Monday, after a lengthy de...
在美國加州,對藝人之保護尤其重要;舉凡樣貌酷似、聲音酷似,或者與藝人之身分有連結因子,即可以藉此感知或察覺或聯想到與某藝人有關的,不管是裝扮或是情境氛圍或塗鴉或數字或圖騰等,都受到保護 。人藉由其努力而累積所得之名氣或知名度,應受到重視,不可未得其允許,任意被人為商業利用;這種知名度應具體化為一種...
諮詢分類