企業法務相關案例分享
▲蘇狀師談人工智能與專利

Thaler v Comptroller [2023] UKSC 49: the UKSC rules that AI cannot be an 'inventor' 英國最高法院判決人工智能不得為發明人。 To the surprise of no one, the UK ...

▲蘇狀師談娛樂法(著作權法篇–模仿屬於著作權法之重製?)

模仿屬於著作權法之重製嗎?甲很喜歡某出版社出版之畫冊集裏的一幅乙所畫的畫作(乙現仍生存),於是就照本宣科畫了一幅畫,甲的行為是否屬於著作權法裏的重製,進而要負民、刑責任?我認為沒有;為什麼? 再者,甲為知名歌星,乙擅長模仿甲,在許多場合模仿甲,漸漸有了知名度,則乙模仿甲的行為,是否侵害甲之表演,若...

▲凡妮莎·布萊恩狀告洛杉磯郡

The co-plaintiff in Vanessa Bryant’s lawsuit against Los Angeles County over the horrific photos taken from the helicopter crash that killed Kobe Brya...

▲熱門法律新聞(蘇狀師)

Kobe Bryant lawsuit: Vanessa Bryant settles with LA County for nearly $30M over leaked crash scene photos 柯比‧布萊恩民事訴訟:就洩漏失事照片一案,凡妮莎‧布萊恩與洛杉磯郡以將近3千萬美元達成...

▲蘇狀師談名人被訴侵害著作權

可惡的狗仔隊到處興訟,並非都需被動以和解收場,有反制之方法。 Emily Ratajkowski Has Settled A History-Making Copyright Lawsuit That Was Filed Against Her After She Posted A Paparaz...